Back to Stories

Yellowstone Officials Call for Near-Record Bison Removal

New bison status report proposes winter herd reduction of more than 1,000

Yellowstone National Park's new status report calls for a reduction in bison population by up to 1,375 individuals. Here, a herd in Hayden Valley forages in winter. Photo by Jim Peaco/NPS
Yellowstone National Park's new status report calls for a reduction in bison population by up to 1,375 individuals. Here, a herd in Hayden Valley forages in winter. Photo by Jim Peaco/NPS
by Isabel Hicks

After last year’s mild winter left few opportunities for Yellowstone National Park to capture and cull animals from its wild bison herd, officials are hoping to remove a near-record number of bison to keep the population from growing.

In a September 30 status report for the superintendent, Yellowstone officials called to reduce the bison population by up to 1,375 animals this coming winter. The recommendation nears the record-high removal in 2022-2023, when the park culled 1,551 migrating bison from the population, spurring protests.

The latest status report is the first since Yellowstone finalized its new bison management plan in July, and agencies collaborating on bison management will review the recommendation at the Interagency Bison Management Plan meeting next Tuesday.

Park scientists estimated the Yellowstone herd at 5,449 bison in August, a population higher than average this year. Over the past five years, the average population of bison post-calving has been 5,130, according to the report.

Yellowstone bison are confined to park boundaries due to the risk of spreading brucellosis to domestic cattle, though Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has also documented elk spreading the disease. Some bison are removed each winter through tribal and state hunting, along with programs that transfer bison meat and live animals to tribal nations.

Under the new management plan, the park prioritizes hunting and transfers of quarantined, brucellosis-free bison to tribes instead of slaughtering animals for meat, a removal option now called the Tribal Food Transfer Program. Officials will manage for a decreasing bison population once numbers exceed the assurance threshold of 5,200 animals, the plan says.
Last winter, just 68 bison were removed: 48 through hunting, 14 donated to the Tribal Food Transfer Program, and six placed in the Bison Conservation Transfer Program. 
Without these management actions the bison population would increase, according to Yellowstone Bison Program Manager Chris Geremia. The growth rate over the past five years has averaged 15.6 percent, “reflecting a steady population increase when management removals are not factored in,” Geremia wrote in the status report.

Geremia also detailed how bison removals are weather dependent: bison are captured when harsh winters force the animals to leave the park in search of food. In mild winters, the migration is smaller and there are fewer bison to capture.
A lone bison feeds in the snow in Yellowstone. Photo by David Restivo/NPS
A lone bison feeds in the snow in Yellowstone. Photo by David Restivo/NPS
Last winter, just 68 bison were removed: 48 through hunting, 14 donated to the Tribal Food Transfer Program, and six placed in the Bison Conservation Transfer Program.

“The size of the migration is driven by weather which is outside the control of the NPS and its partners,” Geremia wrote. “More bison need to be removed during larger migrations, particularly when the population is near the upper target of 6,000.”

But some advocates like Gardiner-based Yellowstone Voices argue the new plan doesn’t address the underlying issue of confining bison to park boundaries and hoped the new plan would curtail routine culling of the bison population. The “shockingly high” numbers from Yellowstone this year show nothing has functionally changed, Jared Pettinato, an attorney for Yellowstone Voices, told Mountain Journal.

“The time has come to end Montana’s senseless, inhumane blockade and to allow our national mammal to migrate to open and available public lands,” Pettinato said. “It would allow the wild bison population to expand, which would allow more tribal hunting and more bison meat for tribal communities.”

A spokesperson for Montana Governor Greg Gianforte did not immediately return a request for comment. The state of Montana has largely opposed allowing wild bison outside Yellowstone due to brucellosis and has pushed the park to reduce the herd size to 3,000 animals.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mountain Journal is a nonprofit, public-interest journalism organization dedicated to covering the wildlife and wild lands of Greater Yellowstone. We take pride in our work, yet to keep bold, independent journalism free, we need your support. Please donate here. Thank you.
Isabel Hicks
About Isabel Hicks

Isabel Hicks is a freelance writer based in Bozeman, Montana. Originally from Denver, Isabel studied journalism and environmental studies at Colorado College. She reported hundreds of stories for the Bozeman Daily Chronicle through the Report for America service program, and her writing has also been featured in Montana Free Press and the Montana Quarterly Magazine.
Increase our impact by sharing this story.
GET OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Defending Nature

Defend Truth &
Wild Places

SUPPORT US
SUPPORT US

Related Stories

September 9, 2024

Virtual Fences: A Promising Tool for Conservation and Ranching
Bozeman workshop and Crazy Mountain project explore the potential in virtual fencing technology.

February 14, 2024

Why are bighorn and domestic sheep hanging out? Here's why we should care.
A respiratory illness common in domestic sheep can devastate wild bighorn sheep herds. In a quest to minimize transmission, a pair of...

May 2, 2024

Bears Emerge from Slumber in Greater Yellowstone
As bruins make spring entrance in the GYE, federal agencies announce the reintroduction of grizzlies in the North Cascades.