Back to StoriesWilderness, America's Second-Best Conservation Idea, Is Under Attack
August 28, 2017
Wilderness, America's Second-Best Conservation Idea, Is Under AttackPart 1: The Wilderness Act—A Short Primer: Franz Camenzind examines what official "wilderness" is.
The Wilderness Act: A Short Primer
If it’s true, as is widely
accepted and as touted by the late Wallace Stegner, that national parks are America’s best idea, then I submit the
nation’s second best idea is our system of wilderness areas.
Established with the passage
of The National Wilderness Preservation System in 1964, The Wilderness Act, as
it is commonly known, has provided the legal framework to protect nearly 110
million acres of wild America from development and exploitation. Let’s ponder this.
By definition, wilderness areas
are large, congressionally-designated tracks of public land set aside to retain
their primeval character- “where the
earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a
visitor who does not remain.”
Further, they pertain to an
area that ”has outstanding opportunities
for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation”. And, where
“there shall be no temporary road, no use of motor vehicles, motorized
equipment or motorboats, no landing of aircraft, no other form of mechanical
transport”. And, in addition, “where the land shall remain unimpaired for
future use and enjoyment.”
What wilderness areas are,
and that they are to exist in a privileged and protected state, is crystal
clear. And, it is federal law. They are not merely physical and legal manifestations on
the land, wilderness areas are a reflection of our values and, you could say,
the anti-thesis of the often thoughtless attitudes that gave way to another of our 20th
century inventions, America-style suburbia.
Golf courses, with their manicured, tamed, artificial essences, albeit visually-pleasing and sedating, are the ultimate manifestations of a "safe" nature. They exist sculpted only on human terms with real wildness allowed only at the margins. You can get hurt there, by fairway tee-shots gone astray or lightning, but humans seldom must ponder forces larger than their own creation. If a grizzly bear crosses the 18th green, which can happen in the higher-elevation courses at Big Sky, it will quickly be reminded that it is out of its element and ushered away or worse; in wilderness, where we are visitors, restraining the innate human instinct to conquer, we are not the architects.
Mother Nature invites us into her cathedral and we are mandated to be respectful guests, getting more out of the experience if we leave trappings of modern world—ringing cell phones and internet service, music buds in our ears, the sounds of anything metal—behind.
Designated wilderness areas
are not arbitrary constructs defined by bureaucratic jargon or lyrical prose,
they hold the inventory of ecologically functioning, native landscapes remaining from the
original “wilderness” that encompassed the entire continent before European
arrival.
These are lands, as known to
native First Peoples, retaining the tangible richness that made America
great. They are the grounds upon which
countless, unique, rare, threatened and endangered species rest their
existence. They are the lands that protect entire watersheds – the sources of
some of our nation’s greatest waterways. The places where natural selection
might still play out. Wilderness areas are the keepers of rare fragments of our
original landscapes, the unaltered remains of our nation’s natural heritage.
"So rare is this, so set apart, the challenge is not that wilderness doesn’t exist or isn’t relevant in our times, but that most Americans have become unable to appreciate places where people and machines, including kinetically-powered ones, are subservient to the law." —Franz Camenzind
So rare is this, so set
apart, the challenge is not that wilderness doesn’t exist or isn’t relevant in
our times, but that most Americans have become unable to appreciate places
where people and machines, including kinetically-powered ones, are subservient
to the law.
Unlike our national parks,
human entry into wilderness areas is meant to occur not by mechanized means,
but only by the most primitive—the soles of our hiking boots and hooves of pack animals—and on simple, lightly-marked trails.
Human presence and imprint is
meant to be transient, not permanent. And like the U.S. Constitution, which distills
description of fundamental human rights down to the spirit of what writers knew
when they created it, the Wilderness Act has living, breathing contemporary
relevancy.
By design, wildernesses were
meant to be sanctuaries where personal revelations could occur at speeds no
faster than human feet or a horse’s walk. And, having known some of the people who were
foundational in writing the law, there was never an intent to transform
wildernesses into industrial-strength recreation areas or race courses.
What becomes permanent about
our relationship with wilderness are the memories formed by the time spent
visiting a wilderness- by living simply, slowly and quietly. By time spent
listening and then hearing, searching and then seeing, learning and then
reflecting.
Wilderness provides the
landscape, real and mental upon which to glimpse our origins, experience the
present and contemplate our future.
The Wilderness Act is not
specifically the purview of any one government agency. Capital “W” status can
be applied to all qualifying U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, National
Park Service and, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands.
In that regard, it is estimated that over 400
million acres of federal lands still qualify for wilderness status but have not
yet been so designated. (This estimate includes inventoried roadless areas of
1,000 acres or greater.) Thus, well over three-quarters of what remains of our
original untrammeled landscape lies unprotected, vulnerable to excess uses and
mechanical entry and development, all of which could forever negate future
Wilderness Act protection.
Clearly, the task of
protecting what remains of our pre-European natural history is not complete. In a crowded human anthill world, the time to designate more wilderness areas, giving them as a gift to the future, is upon us. If we fail to do so,
particularly with today’s political and industrial pressures, we risk losing
millions of acres of wilderness quality lands to development interests: energy
extraction, road construction, privatization and a host of other schemes all of
which, if permitted, would forever degrade these last wild lands. The blue print for protection is in place, we
have a law that works, now we must complete the project– while supplies still
last.
Next: In part 2 of the ongoing MoJo series, "Modern Wilderness", Camenzind will explore efforts underway in Congress to amend the Wilderness Act and undermine the essence of wilderness lands. The push is being made ironically by people who claim to stand within the ranks of conservation.
Related Stories
January 24, 2018
Who Is Willing To Defend American Wilderness?
As attacks on wilderness and environmental laws rage, many citizens wonder why some prominent conservation groups seem to be missing in...
July 25, 2018
Are We Seeking Escape To—Or From—The Real World?
Naturalist Susan Marsh, a maven of the high country, helps us find an answer in the 'wildflower forest'
September 6, 2017
Wilderness: America's Second-Best Idea Is Under Attack—Unfortunately By Some Recreationists
In this second part of an ongoing series on wilderness in America, MoJo columnist Franz Camenzind shines a light on efforts...