
by David Tucker
After months of contentious campaigning, Park County residents have elected to retain their growth policy. Voting 2,035 to 1,365 against Referendum 1, a citizen-initiated ballot measure advocating for repeal, voters on June 4 let their voices be heard. A 60 percent majority supported keeping the policy in place while county officials work on an update to the existing blueprint.
โResidents of Park County have made it clear they want to protect local control and reject uncontrolled development,โ No Ref 1 campaign treasurer Colin Davis said in a statement. โThis outcome shows we all care deeply about the future of Park County and that we, not out-of-state developers, know the best way to protect our way of life.โ
According to the most recent We Will Park County survey, that way of life revolves around landscapes, natural amenities and quality of life, which many residents view as threatened by recent unprecedented growth. Since 2000, nearly 38,000 acres of Park County have been converted to housing, and 61 percent of the 2,782 new homes were constructed on large lots of more than 10 acres.
This development model fragments habitat and disrupts migration corridors by increasing the presence of fencing, new roads and permanent structures. Wildlife have been particularly impacted by the increase in traffic through Paradise Valley, according to a recent Center for Large Landscape Conservation study. Between 2012-2023, the study said, 1,685 animals were reported killed in collisions with vehicles, equaling $32 million in direct damages and up to $72 million in intrinsic losses.
โItโs a huge relief to have this growth policy stay in place,โ said Erica Lighthiser, interim executive director of Park County Environmental Council. โGoals and objectives that have a lot to do with the issues we care about at PCECโland, water, wildlife, protecting open land and healthy landscapesโthereโs so much in that policy that creates this guiding vision.โ
While the margin of victory was significant, only registered voters in unincorporated parts of the county are eligible to cast a ballot, per Montana law. That left residents of Livingston and Clyde Parkโabout 50 percent of the populationโwithout the power to participate. Overall, 3,400 ballots were cast, representing a voter turnout rate of 43 percent.
โResidents of Park County have made it clear they want to protect local control and reject uncontrolled development.โ โ
Colin Davis, treasurer, No Ref 1 campaign
Had a majority of residents voted yes on Ref 1, Park would join Ravalli as the only other county in Montana to opt for repeal. With the votes tallied, county officials can now move on to the work of updating the policy, as required by state statute.
โNow that our current growth policy is upheld, itโs time to make it work even better for Park County during the planned update period,โ Davis said. โCommunity participation is the best recipe to ensure the next iteration of our growth policy is comprehensive, community-driven and will adequately protect our rural way of life amidst the next wave of growth and development.โ

Mountain Journal is the only nonprofit, public-interest journalism organization of its kind dedicated to covering the wildlife and wild lands of Greater Yellowstone. We take pride in our work, yet to keep bold, independent journalism free, we need your support. Please donate here. Thank you.
