Maintaining Forward Progress With The Great Bear

Newberg is a hunter who calls Bozeman, Montana, his home. He is the producer of two popular TV shows, “Fresh Tracks” and “On Your Own Adventures,” as well as the Hunt Talk Podcast, where he advocates for sportsmen and public land access.

The first time Newberg encountered a grizzly bear at close range, he says drawing a sidearm, aiming, and then placing an accurate shot would have been near impossible. He was on an archery elk hunt in Southwest Montana, full of anticipation after spotting a herd of cow elk. As he crested a small hill, he came head-on upon a boar grizzly, maybe 12 yards away.

Fortune looked kindly upon Newberg—the boar turned and hoofed it after realizing Newberg was there. “He covered ground so fast,” Newberg says. “If he would have decided to come toward me, he would have been on top of me so quickly. I wouldn’t have been able to arm myself. I now have no false ideas that I’m going to do some John Wayne or Clint Eastwood thing on a charging grizzly bear.”

Carrying bear spray is one of a handful of behaviors that have become customary for Newberg as he ventures into areas that are home to grizzly bears. Newberg chooses to take these precautions out of a sense of self-responsibility for the conservation of grizzly bears and he hopes other people who find themselves in bear country will consider taking proactive steps as well.

Our behaviors and choices all play in to the larger picture that is the future of grizzly bears in Montana. And a future that is bright for both grizzly bears and people depends on the actions of local communities, businesses, nonprofits and individuals.

The essential role of stakeholders is emphasized in the work of the Montana Governor’s Grizzly Bear Advisory Council and its newly released recommendations for how wildlife officials should manage bears. These recommendations, released on Sept. 8, will provide a starting point for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks as the agency drafts a new statewide grizzly bear management plan that will address grizzly bears as an endangered species and their management after delisting.

Newberg, 55, has called Bozeman his home for almost 30 years. It’s a burgeoning place today, but one nestled in a microcosm of the Rocky Mountains, an area ripe with elk country lore. But the heavy timber and robust forage of good elk habitat is excellent grizzly bear habitat too.

The first night Newberg spent camped out in thick griz country, every sound was amplified. Snapping sticks from a winter-ready squirrel or the rustling of leaves on a cool breeze triggered an immediate worry: What was that? Was that a bear?

“I want to hunt elk, so I had to figure out how to get over fears about grizzly bears,” he says. “For me that meant learning all about grizzlies so I can avoid conflicts. The more you know about bears, the easier it is to avoid them.”

Hunting poses an interesting complication in bear habitat: in order to successfully pursue game, hunters travel quietly, often at daylight or dark. This is contrary to the typical bear-safe recommendations: hike in groups of three or more; avoid hiking at dawn, dusk or at night; make noise; stay on maintained trails.

Newberg shared his thoughts about how to safely hunt in grizzly bear habitat during a July episode of The Elk Talk Podcast with Corey Jacobsen. Among other points, Newberg told Jacobsen that by knowing bear behavior you can better predict where bruins might or might not be.

For example, in the steep, furrowed mountains of the Madison Range, during Montana’s September archery season, grizzly bears are likely at high elevations eating army cutworm moths that feed on the nectar of alpine wildflowers by night and rest under rocks and boulders by day. Also, grizzlies could be congregated on north-facing, brushy slopes still abounding with huckleberries. Knowing these two things, a hunter could reduce his or her likelihood of stumbling upon a bear by avoiding the high-density areas: high, rocky elevations and brushy north slopes.

He added that if the spot you plan to elk hunt is especially bear-dense, it could be worth it to hunt earlier in the season—such as during September archery or the beginning of rifle season in October—when bears are still looking for moths and berries, as opposed to later in the season when they’ve started scavenging on hunter-killed carcasses and are getting ready to den in late October or November.

Another scenario unique to hunters that is also a high-risk setting for bear encounters is during animal processing. “Getting an elk down on the ground in grizzly bear country is the hunter’s definition of mixed emotions,” Newberg told Jacobsen. There’s a great sense of excitement and accomplishment, as well as the realization that you now have to process the animal, spending time focused on gutting and preparing what has already become a bear attractant.

“I’m really proud that Montana is one of the places that grizzly bears have always been. It’s an example of the conservation ethic in Montana,” he says.

In 1975, with some 800 to1,000 grizzlies remaining in the Lower 48—down from an estimated population of 50,000-100,000 prior to the 19^th century—the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed grizzlies as threatened under the newly-created Endangered Species Act..

The decades of robust conservation efforts that followed affirmed the public’s commitment to preserving grizzly bears. Albeit a slow journey, the distinct grizzly populations near Glacier and Yellowstone National Parks—known as the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) and Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE)—steadily grew in health and number and by the year 2000, the public heard rumblings of delisting.

The Fish and Wildlife Service—the federal agency responsible for the oversight of listed species—sought delisting of the distinct GYE population in 2007 and 2017, however several groups sued the agency and federal courts overturned the delisting rules over fears of prematurity. Litigation has continued in offices and courtrooms, meanwhile on the ground in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho, communities and wildlife managers are wrestling with the challenges that come with more people and more bears in some areas and dwindling bear populations in others.

Currently grizzly bears are managed in the Lower 48 with an interagency, multi-state approach that includes oversight from the Fish and Wildlife Service and field support from the state wildlife departments, US Forest Service and US. Geological Survey, which oversees the Yellowstone Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team.

The silvertip was listed on the Endangered Species List under six distinct populations—six areas bears were known to still exist in 1975. These are the Greater Yellowstone, Northern Continental Divide, Bitterroot, Cabinet-Yaak, Selkirk and North Cascades ecosystems. Today, USFWS reports there are an estimated 700 bears in Greater Yellowstone, 1,000 in the Northern Continental Divide, maybe 50 to 60 in the Cabinet-Yaak, and 70 to 80 in the Selkirk. There is not yet a resident population of grizzlies in Montana and Idaho’s Bitterroot Ecosystem or Washington’s North Cascades.

In 2000, then governors Jim Geringer of Wyoming, Marc Racicot of Montana and Dirk Kempthorne of Idaho convened the Governors’ Roundtable on the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy. This roundtable comprised of 15 citizens, five each from Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, who were charged with thoroughly reviewing an interagency draft of what is known as a “Conservation Strategy.” This document guides conservation and management actions upon delisting for bears in and around the Greater Yellowstone.

At the time, former Director of Fish Wildlife and Parks Patrick Graham said, "Bears do not recognize political boundaries. That’s why Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and the federal land management agencies must work together."

Newberg was among those 15 individuals who were appointed to develop the plan. “I look at the amount of changes, how much change of their daily lives Montanans agreed to,” he says, describing a cease in timber sales, grazing allotments and motorized use in core grizzly habitat. “This happened because people said they would be willing to make changes. That was a generation ago. It was a huge part of what allowed grizzly bears to recover as they have today. The amount of sacrifice that the citizens of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming have made should not be forgotten.”

“Grizzly bears are valued by people and cultures across Montana and around the world,” Montana Gov. Steve Bullock wrote last year. “Grizzly bears are also feared and can affect people’s livelihoods and safety. … Grizzly bear numbers in Montana continue to increase, and have expanded into areas where they have not been for decades, including places key to connecting their populations. … Existing management plans did not fully anticipate grizzly bear distribution across the landscape and as Montana’s human population continues to grow, we can expect conflicts between bears and people to increase in frequency and complexity.”

These words begin an Executive Order calling together a citizen panel that was tasked with creating a vision for grizzly bears across the entire state. In July 2019, Bullock appointed 18 members from more than 150 applicants to sit on the Governor’s Grizzly Bear Advisory Council, which met monthly between October 2019 and September 2020 in order to discuss current conservation measures and community challenges then draft a series of recommendations that will guide Fish Wildlife and Parks as they look to develop a statewide bear plan.

On Sept. 8, the council released recommendations that provide guidance on how the council would like to see FWP interact with bears. Specifically, these recommendations consider topics like public education, conflict prevention and response, bear distribution, and funding. They include the council’s thoughts on a possible grizzly hunt if they are delisted, and recommend funding priorities. Look for a story soon in Mountain Journal on what the council recommended.

Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks Director Martha Williams says this statewide approach is an important step in continued grizzly bear conservation—at a time when bears are beginning to expand into areas outside the original recovery areas—as the conservation strategies deliberately leave for each state the discretion to prioritize and enact goals for attaining healthy and sustainable populations of grizzlies, provide for human safety, and minimize impacts to people’s livelihoods.

“As bears move to new areas, they also move into areas that contain more private lands or communities,” Williams says. “Regardless of whether the grizzly bear is listed and covered by the Endangered Species Act or not, we all have a responsibility to understand what is needed to help people and bears, and take actions to help both. We at MT FWP recognize that a robust public engagement process helps inform a thoughtful approach to grizzly bear management. It does not replace science, as science informs and serves as a critical foundation to our actions. Yet, much of grizzly bear recovery centers on conflict prevention, conflict reduction, and information, education and outreach. Those require working with people and communities.”

Throughout the council process, members have worked hard trying to explain their personal values and experiences while also hearing and understanding the values and experiences of other council members. Their process was guided by Heather Stokes and Shawn Johnson, social scientists from Missoula’s University of Montana. Unique from many other working groups, this council chose to not only lead their own discussions, but also appoint a member-derived writing team that drafted their recommendations, as opposed to relying on agency staff.

“I am immensely grateful for the difficult, inclusive and intentional conversations the Grizzly Bear Advisory Council took on,” Williams says. “They poured their hearts and souls into their work. They clearly cared and they put the time and effort in to develop big-picture guidance and actionable recommendations for the Governor, Montana and ultimately MT FWP.

“How lovely is it to see a group of committed individuals with widely disparate views come to respect each other and not only respect where each is coming from, but take on the hard and uncomfortable work of trying to figure out how to move forward, where to go, how to guide Montana in this important work?,” she adds. “I’d argue Montanan’s have done this time and time again, and how grateful we can all be for those individuals willing to roll up their sleeves and take on a task that can be thankless. Yet, it’s how we do our best work and work that is needed.”

Newberg recalls the challenges of working together to find solutions—there were controversial issues the Governors’ Roundtable had to work out 20 years ago. But he says it took reasonable people who were willing to see issues from another’s point of view. It required talking, a willingness to become vulnerable, and deep respect and trust. And tackling those hard issues still requires those things.

“When people sit at the table,” Newberg says, “you know they want to be part of the solutions. If you care about wild places and wild things, you get satisfaction that Montana is still a place where bears can be. Regardless of delisting, I think Montanans can be proud that we’ve always made space and accommodation for grizzly bears.”