Back to StoriesBLM Public Lands Rule: Why is it Important in Greater Yellowstone?
June 6, 2024
BLM Public Lands Rule: Why is it Important in Greater Yellowstone?Despite 90 percent support in public comment period, new rule faces strong opposition from resource-extraction advocates
Part of the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management last month finalized the Public Lands Rule, which expands its multiple-use mandate to include restoration and mitigation leases alongside other resource extraction leases. Despite widespread support, it faces opposition from resource-extraction groups. Photo by Bob Wick, BLM
by Julia Barton
Roughly one in every 10 acres in the United States is public
land administered by the Bureau of Land Management, an area totaling 245
million acres. And about 15 percent of this land sits in Montana, Wyoming and
Idaho. These landscapes are federally stewarded for recreation, livestock
grazing, mining and drilling, among other uses, per BLM’s governing law, the
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
The agency last month finalized a ruling that expands its
multiple use mandate to include restoration and mitigation leases alongside
other resource extraction leases in what Kathy Rinaldi, deputy director of
conservation at the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, said is the “most significant change in the management of BLM lands in
50 years.”
The final Public Lands Rule was published in the Federal Register on
May 9, 2024
following a lengthy drafting process that began over a year ago.
Understanding the importance of the Public Lands Rule
requires looking back at FLPMA and its political context, explained Michael
Carroll, BLM campaign director at the Wilderness Society. Shortly after the
bill’s enactment, Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential victory began an eight-year
run.
“[The Reagan administration’s] vision for public lands was
that they were here for oil and gas development, mining, logging, all that kind
of stuff,” Carroll told Mountain Journal.
“Because of that, they basically didn’t do the regulatory framework for
conservation, even though everything that’s called out in the new Public Lands
Rule is actually pointing to and directed by FLPMA.”
The new Public Lands Rule aims to prioritize conservation alongside resource extraction.
Not much changed with the way BLM managed land over the
following decades, according to Carroll, until the Biden administration’s 2020
assessment of climate and biodiversity on public lands. They found that
climate-related impacts including fires, drought and insects have had an
increased impact on the landscape over the past two decades, prompting the new
rule.
Carroll believes climate impacts are hindering federal land
managers from fulfilling their mission, which BLM says is “to sustain the
health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment
of present and future generations.” The new Public Lands Rule addresses this by
prioritizing conservation alongside resource extraction.
In the final ruling, BLM renames “conservation leases” as “restoration
leases” and “mitigation leases.” The former focuses on restoring degraded
landscapes. For example, a landowner may take out a restoration lease on
adjacent BLM land overrun with invasive grasses to restore native plant life,
improving both the leased and private land. The latter lease type offsets
impacts from extractive practices like mining and oil drilling on public land.
Instead of leasing private land for mitigation, companies can now mitigate on
other public landscapes, allowing areas to recover for future uses.
“The point we’re at with federal lands is critical,” GYC’s Rinaldi
said. “This is allowing other partners and players who value public lands to be
a part of conservation on public lands.”
Most federal public land in Greater Yellowstone is managed
by the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service, however, some critical
lower-elevation areas are administered by BLM. These include winter ranges for
large game and prairie habitats for species like the sage grouse, which face
population threats due to habitat loss.
Idaho’s Sand Creek Desert, between Island Park and Rexburg,
is a high-priority area for sage grouse and is also valuable for oil drilling
and livestock grazing, Rinaldi explained. In the event of a wildfire—the
National Interagency Fire Center predicts above-average
fire potential in southeast Idaho this summer—conservation
organizations could use a restoration lease to revive grouse habitat after a
burn.
“There's lots of places [in Greater Yellowstone] where this
could be applied in very positive ways on the landscape that would benefit
multiple stakeholders,” Rinaldi said.
Despite overwhelming positive feedback during the 90-day public comment period —BLM received approximately 200,000 responses with roughly 90 percent support—the rule faces opposition on two fronts.
The rule could also have general impacts on those living and
recreating across the West, according to Carroll. He said it clarifies the
regulatory process for designating recreational areas, like hiking and biking
trail networks, as Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. These recreation
areas are important economic resources to western communities, similar to
mining or oil extraction. A designation would protect them from future resource
extraction, Carroll explained.
Despite overwhelming positive feedback during the 90-day
public comment period during the drafting process—BLM received approximately
200,000 responses with roughly 90 percent support, according to Carroll—the
rule faces opposition on two fronts.
“There are folks that were never going to get to a ‘yes’ on
the Public Lands Rule, that are just ideologically opposed to having
conservation be balanced with resource extraction,” Carroll said. “We've
anticipated and already seen legislation being pushed, largely by Republicans,
in both the House and the Senate to basically prohibit the BLM from
implementing the Public Lands Rule.”
The most successful legislation so far has been the WEST Act of 2023, H.R.
3397,
championed by Rep. John R. Curtis from Utah. The bill, which aims to force BLM
to roll back the Public Lands Rule and prohibit similar future rules, has
passed the House. Carroll doubts it will progress further under the current
administration but predicts Republican lawmakers will try to use the
Congressional Review Act to reverse the rule if the administration changes.
Legal challenges are also expected, arguing that the administration lacks the
authority to make such a ruling.
“All of that is sort of a bag of tricks that prevent us from
having nice things like a sustainable environment,” Carroll said.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mountain Journal is the only nonprofit, public-interest journalism organization of its kind dedicated to covering the wildlife and wild lands of Greater Yellowstone. We take pride in our work, yet to keep bold, independent journalism free, we need your support. Please donate here. Thank you.
Related Stories
October 26, 2023
Bridging the Divide: How to decrease wildlife-vehicle collisions
More than 1 million vehicles use US Highway 191 to enter Yellowstone. With a quarter of all crashes involving wildlife, what's...
December 7, 2023
After 20 Years of Lawsuits, Wolverine Listed as Threatened
Wolverines face numerous threats and only 300 exist in the Lower 48. Now that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed...
January 2, 2024
50 Years: How the Endangered Species Act Influenced Greater Yellowstone
To celebrate the 50th anniversary of the
Endangered Species Act, Mountain Journal looks at the landmark legislation’s
impact on some of Greater Yellowstone’s...