Back to StoriesThe Man Behind the Snowpack
December 3, 2024
The Man Behind the SnowpackEric Larson knows how critical water is in the West. As winters get warmer, the snowpack data Larson and his colleagues collect may benefit everything from ranchers and climate scientists to wildlife.
NRCS Water Supply Specialist and Outreach Liaison Eric Larson poses with his pooch in the field. Larson has been with NRCS since 2010, first as an engineer and moved over to the snow survey program in 2013. Here, he poses with his dog Indy, aka Indy Anna Bones. Photo courtesy Eric Larson
by Isabel Hicks
Eric Larson loves the snow. As much time as he spends in
the Montana mountains, and considering his job, he has to.
For more than a decade, Larson has conducted snow surveys
for the Montana Natural Resources Conservation Service. With a background in
civil engineering and a lifelong admiration for snow and skiing, Larson
collects snowpack and hydrology data from measurement stations across the Treasure
State. He writes monthly
water-supply
forecast reports from January to June, providing key
data used by farmers and ranchers, recreationists, reservoir managers, and climate
scientists, among others.
“Snow is highly important in the western U.S.” said Larson,
the water supply specialist and outreach liaison for NRCS, an arm of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
“Particularly in Montana, around 80 percent of our water supply originates from
our mountain snowpack.” In this MoJo interview,
Larson discusses the importance of snowpack intel and how his team preps all
summer for the extensive amount of data they collect. As Greater Yellowstone
settles in for winter, close to 100 automated sites across Montana are set to
measure another year of precipitation.
The following interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.
Mountain Journal: How did you
become interested in hydrology and snow science, and end up in your job in
Montana?
Eric Larson: I
grew up in Minnesota and always enjoyed water in the summers and skiing in the
winters. I was passionate about snow recreationally and realized the importance
of it to everything from an early age. I moved to Montana in the early 2000s to
go to school … [at Montana State University] for civil engineering and focused
on water resources. I was familiar with the snow survey program at the time,
using it … mainly for skiing. Professionally, I saw some job openings within
the NRCS snow survey program and jumped into my first position in 2013.
MoJo:
Why is snowpack data important to collect and what is it
used for?
E.L.: In Montana and the western U.S.,
snowpack is a natural reservoir that builds throughout the winter, and water
gradually releases during the spring and summer months. Our biggest consumer of
water in the western U.S. is agriculture, so people rely heavily on our data,
particularly for irrigation. We also work with water management reservoir
operators to determine how much water is anticipated to flow into reservoirs
and how much water they should release.
In the mid-1930s, Congress started realizing the importance of snowpack and water supply. The SNOTEL network was originally established in the 1970s and one of the oldest sites, Lick Creek, is south of Bozeman, Montana.
We work a lot with the Montana Drought
Assessment Team too and keep them up to date on conditions. Emergency
preparedness folks with the National Weather Service [use our data] for flood
forecasting, and the avalanche centers for avalanche forecasting. The data is
also helpful for scientific research and climate assessments. And then some of
our other biggest users are just recreational folks like skiers and
snowmobilers who look at the data to see how much snow there is.
MoJo: Are
there any trends or changes in snowpack levels that you have noticed from year
to year?
E.L.: It’s not really within the scope of
this program in terms of looking into trends. We just collect all the data and
forecast based on current conditions. I have seen some really big [snow] years
recently and I’ve seen some really low years. It fluctuates. There are a lot of
groups using our data to make some of those forecasts, like the Montana or
Greater Yellowstone Climate Assessments, that make predictions on what snowpack
may look like mid-century.
MoJo: The Montana
Climate Assessment forecasts
a reduction in overall snowpack, more frequent drought years, and area
precipitation falling more as rain than snow. What are the impacts of those
forecasts? Are you concerned?
E.L:
It’s concerning to think about a reduction in snowpack because,
ultimately, that will be a major change in timing of the water we receive. If
we had less snow, that's certainly concerning for the overall water supply
during the summer growing season. In these hot, dry summer months, things
really start drying up, and if there's no water running into our rivers from
melting snow, that's a serious issue. In lower snow years there’s less water
for irrigation, recreation, there might be river restrictions for fishing.
If
we're receiving more rain rather than snow, particularly in the spring, that
water is running through the system faster. Our water supply is mostly stored
up in the mountains as snowpack—which melts and releases relatively slowly into
our stream systems—but if it was rain, that water goes through the system more
immediately. And if you have an above-normal snowpack in June, rain falling on
snow melts snow very fast and can cause flooding, as we experienced in 2022.
MoJo: How will those forecasted climate
swings impact the snow survey program?
E.L.: I think that the best path forward in
terms of this program is to keep expanding the [SNOTEL] network, providing more
data for folks managing that water, and monitoring lower elevation snowpack
more as well to see how that’s changing over time. With population growth in
the West, it’s going to be even more important to manage that water tightly.
And that’s what we do: we provide that information that helps people plan for
managing the water.
Click
here to access the interactive version of the map below.
An NRCS map shows the different water basins across Montana and how their current snowpack levels compare to the 30-year median. Percentages above 100% reflect a heavier snow year, and percentages below 100% show a drier year. Map courtesy NRCS
MoJo: How
does your team prepare for the winter data collection?
E.L.: Operating this large network of
mountain weather stations requires a lot of fieldwork, planning, logistics and getting
out there to make sure they’re all running properly. Currently, eight of us go
to all the SNOTEL sites each year and do routine summer maintenance and sensor
calibration. In Montana, we have 96 SNOTEL sites, and across the entire Western
U.S. network, we have 911 sites. The Montana data collection office also covers
sites in northern Wyoming, so we actually have 135 sites that we maintain.
In the summer, we have to go to every single one each year
to make sure it’s ready for winter. We swap out the fluid in the precipitation
gauge, calibrate the sensors, and make sure to remove any extra vegetation
encroaching onto the site.
Snow is highly important in the western U.S. Particularly in Montana, around 80 percent of our water supply originates from our mountain snowpack.
MoJo: Where
are the SNOTEL sites and how do you get to them?
E.L.: The sites range in elevation across
the state. They’re generally located in mid-to-high elevation mountain bands,
below alpine. It’s very hard to measure consistent snowpack in alpine areas
because of the wind, so we have them in forested areas. The lowest sites in
northwest Montana are about 4,200 feet elevation, and the highest sites in the
Greater Yellowstone region are about 10,000 feet.
Anytime we’re going to a SNOTEL site, we have to bring all
our calibration equipment, which is generally a couple hundred pounds, and
tools to fix any equipment that’s broken. Lots of snow and harsh weather can
bend equipment. Things can break from wildlife. Bears like to push things over.
So about 40 percent [of the sites] we access by ATV or UTV.
We have several sites that are accessed by helicopter, a handful of sites where
we can drive a pickup truck to, and then we do have some in wilderness areas on
non-motorized trails that require horses to get into the field.
MoJo: How
many times were you on a horse for work this summer?
E.L.: I went on a horseback trip to Two
Ocean Plateau in Yellowstone National Park this summer. So that was one day
riding in 26 miles, one day of work on the site, and the third day riding
horses out. That was my only horsepacking trip this summer, but my coworkers
went on other ones.
Testing metal and butyl snow pillows at Lick Creek, south of Bozeman, Montana, one of the earliest SNOTEL sites in the country. Photo courtesy NRCS
MoJo: What
do the sites look like? And what does the equipment consist of?
E.L.: Each SNOTEL site has a snow pillow,
which measures the weight of the snowpack and gives you the snow-water
equivalent. Next to the snow pillow there’s a tower about 20 feet tall, and
there’s some hydrometeorological equipment on that tower to measure snow depth
and air temperature. We also have a precipitation gauge, which measures both
rain and snow. Those are the standard sensors, but we also have some sites with
extra sensors like soil moisture, relative humidity and wind speed. And then
there’s a shelter for housing all the electronics, which has solar panels on it
for powering the equipment, and a transmitter for automated transmitting of the
data.
MoJo: When
were the SNOTEL sites installed? Does NRCS ever install new ones?
E.L.: The SNOTEL network was originally
established in the 1970s ... when technology became available for automatically collecting and transmitting data. One of the oldest sites in the west-wide network is
near Bozeman, and that’s the Lick Creek SNOTEL. Prior to
that we used snow courses, which are still around.
New sites are still installed today, and a big part of my
job is network expansion. I [analyze] where we need new sites, so I go out and
try to find these perfect spots at certain elevations, walking around the
woods. We typically install one to two new sites per year. In 2020, Congress
passed the Snow Water Supply Forecasting Program Authorization Act. We’re
currently working on an extra push to install more stations and expand our
staff.
MoJo: You
mentioned that before SNOTEL sites, snowpack measurements were taken by “snow
courses.” How do those work and are they still around?
E.L.: In the mid-1930s, Congress started
realizing the importance of snowpack and water supply. But we didn’t have the
technology or electronics for SNOTEL sites so everything had to be manually
measured, and they established a program for snow courses, which are still
around today. In Montana there are 104 snow courses, and 1,153 in the western
U.S.
Snow courses are just a transect of snow sampling points,
located in forests and similar spots to SNOTEL sites, out of the wind. We
measure the exact same locations across that transect once a month and take the
average, [then] get automated daily data from SNOTELS, and monthly data from
snow courses. People go out there and measure them with snow tubes, which are
basically 30-inch sections, an inch-and-a-half in diameter, lightweight and
made of aluminum. You screw the sections together and you take a snow core.
Then you weigh that snow core and can calibrate it to inches of water, and they
also measure the snow depth.
Our staff isn’t large enough to measure all the snow
courses, so we collaborate with different federal and state agencies,
contractors and volunteers to get out and take those physical measurements,
using skis, snowmobiles or helicopters.
MoJo: What
was one memorable experience you had while doing fieldwork?
E.L.: This summer, a coworker and I were
working at a SNOTEL site in the Beartooth [Mountains]. I was up on a tower next
to the shelter, working about 20 feet in the air. My coworker was on the ground
and I heard him yell, “Bear!” Then a grizzly walked over to the site. It was
probably about 20 yards away from him. He was right next to the tower, so he
just climbed up and joined me on top of the shelter. It was a little scary, but
at the same time it was really neat to see that bear. It wasn’t aggressive or
anything, just curious. It just walked through and moved on.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mountain Journal is a nonprofit, public-interest journalism organization dedicated to covering the wildlife and wild lands of Greater Yellowstone. We take pride in our work, yet to keep bold, independent journalism free, we need your support. Please donate here. Thank you.
Related Stories
October 15, 2023
Dayton Duncan on Tragedy, Hope and Duality in New PBS Doc ‘The American Buffalo’
The acclaimed writer and filmmaker discusses his latest collaboration, "The American Buffalo," a two-part film with Ken Burns premiering on PBS...
April 29, 2024
What Dreams May Come
Maddie Pellman, host
of the ‘Who Runs This Park?’ podcast, discusses how dreaming big delivered her dream
job.
December 11, 2023
In New Book, Barbara Kingsolver and Daughter Lily Teach Children Empathy for Wildlife
Barbara and Lily Kingsolver discuss 'Coyote’s Wild Home,' family publishing and the importance of balance in wild places like Greater Yellowstone.
...