problem is that the Lords of Yesteryear never disappeared as we were promised
and the challenges of the New West are far worse than we were promised. I
don’t want a West of man-camps and gas field booms, nor a West of precious
tourist towns that exist to feed a global cowboy/mountain man/Disney/ski
resort/New Age fantasy, surrounded by busted towns that are ghettos for
workers.” —Luther Propst
Does the "M" on the Bridgers stand for Minneapolis? When projected out at a three percent growth rate, Bozeman/Gallatin Valley will reach the present-day population of Minneapolis proper in half a century. In fact, Bozeman/Gallatin is growing at four percent, meaning it will be Salt Lake City-proper-sized in 18 years and Minneapolis sized in 36 years. Composite photo of Minneapolis skyline and Bozeman created by MoJo staff
In the stillness of a summer morning, haze from wildfire
smoke thickening the air, Randy Carpenter arrives for a hike up Sypes Canyon in
the pastoral northern outskirts of Bozeman, Montana. Ascending into the Bridger
Mountain foothills, we talk about how “crazy” it feels these days “in town," how quickly new subdivisions are springing up in fields that a year ago were
covered with wheat.
And then Carpenter starts in, reciting some jaw-dropping
statistics that seem abstract until we reach an overlook and gaze clear-eyed
into an uncertain future.
Before us, and stretching for nearly 40 miles to the next
muted horizon is the Gallatin Valley, one of the fastest-growing semi-rural
settings in America. Carpenter, known for his work as a career land use
planner, says it won’t be long, given current trend-lines, before the vast
chasm of space fills in with exurban development.
Yes, it’s a fact in the Anthropocene: places
grow and inevitably change. I’ve been fortunate to view some of the more spectacular undiscovered ones
firsthand in my reporting around the world, but what Carpenter says has
radically altered the way I think about the place I call home—the place that I assumed given the huge base of public lands would always be protected.
It’s made me realize no other models from elsewhere can be
imported to resolve what’s currently happening rapidly in Greater Yellowstone,
the wildest corner of the Lower 48 states.
The Gallatin Valley is rapidly filling in, with scattershot sprawl sweeping across rural areas of the county. “Before a baby born this year graduates from the new high school in Bozeman, she will watch the valley where she’s growing up add the equivalent of a Boulder, Colorado to the landscape," Randy Carpenter says. Photo courtesy EcoFlight (ecoflight.org)
Rather, the paradoxical challenge, Carpenter says, is that Greater
Yellowstone’s own salvation depends upon it becoming the
example other regions
with wildlands in their backyards emulate. But it means achieving something
that’s seldom been accomplished in the modern world—defying human nature.
Bozeman/Gallatin County presently is inhabited by around
105,000 human denizens. One of every ten Montanans dwells here. But within 24
years, given a three percent growth rate, the number will double.
It means that Bozeman/Gallatin, by 2041, will equal the
size of Salt Lake City proper (minus its suburbs). Even more sobering, in less than half a
century, 2065, based on the same rate of annual growth, there will be a
population of 420,000 (equal to all the residents of the entire Greater
The paradoxical challenge, Carpenter says, is that Greater Yellowstone’s own salvation depends upon it becoming the example other regions with wildlands in their backyards emulate. But it means achieving something that’s seldom been accomplished in the modern world—defying human nature.
That’s a concentration of people, to put it in perspective, Minneapolis-sized (not including St. Paul and the suburbs), consuming much of the open space between the Bridgers and the distant ranch/farmlands around
Three Forks, the town so named because it’s where the Gallatin, Madison and
Jefferson rivers converge to form the birthplace of the Missouri.
Many Bozemanians, Carpenter admits, probably find the
prospect of us becoming Salt Lake and then Minneapolis inconceivable, especially
steadfastly fought progressive planning and zoning, impact fees, placing conservation
initiatives on the ballot for voters to decide and anything else they find to be restrictive of
Point of fact and this is the shocking part, Gallatin
County is actually
growing at better than a four percent rate
—not three. (Recently,
I spoke with a local public health official who serves on a committee addressing the shortage of doctors in southwest Montana and the demographic data they are
using suggests the growth rate for Bozeman/Gallatin is actually eight
percent, meaning the scenario
above could happen twice as fast).
Carpenter uses three percent to be conservative in his extrapolation—indisputable and very
conservative, it turns out, given still other wildcard factors that could make
the growth projections seem quaint. He makes his calculation using the "rule of 72" in which the constant growth rate is divided into 72 and it provides the number of years it takes a locale to double in population. (Ironically, the same formula can be used for calculated return on investment). A three percent annual growth rate means Bozeman/Gallatin will double in 24 years. A four-percent rate, meanwhile, means it would only take 18 years to reach Salt Lake City and 36 years (or the year 2053) to match the population of present-day Minneapolis proper.
Growth, some opine, is always good, that it’s better to be
booming in the West instead of busting. But the questions are: good for whom
good for what
, and how are growth’s real impacts and hidden costs really being manifested? Most importantly, who
is paying for them?
Bozeman, as the largest community in the Greater
Yellowstone Ecosystem, could be regarded as its capital city yet it does not
exist in isolation; its trends have huge implications for every corner of the
Bozeman/Gallatin, by 2041, will equal the size of Salt Lake City proper (minus its suburbs). Even more sobering, in less than half a century, 2065, based on the same rate of annual growth, there will be a population of 420,000 here, equal to present-day Minneapolis proper. And Carpenter says that could actually be a conservative estimate, with this scenario arriving faster than people think.
While the effects of climate change are considered so
amorphous, that, for now, they’re difficult to wrap one’s mind around,
projections for growth, based on extrapolations of hard existing data, are
impossible to dismiss.
There is today a palpable sense of social unrest welling
up in Bozeman related to the multiplying impacts of growth. It is accompanied by a widespread perception that developers, especially speculators who made fortunes in real estate development in states like California, Utah and Colorado, have moved in for the kill, taking advantage of naive, provincial-minded planning staffs that are increasingly overwhelmed and codes that are lax compared to where the developers came from.
There’s no denying the physical
manifestations transforming a landscape like the Gallatin Valley that, since in
the 1860s, has held some of the richest farmland in the state while providing
key wildlife habitat for species synonymous with the ecosystem.
“The impacts of growth are not only accelerating. The effects are compounding,” Carpenter says.
“This isn’t just another boom that will eventually be mitigated by another
The eruption of development is unprecedented, permanent
and the impacts irreversible, he notes. Unless leaders in the region, from public land managers to city and county elected officials, become consciously
aware of what’s happening and try to get ahead of it, the consequences will be severe, ecologically and economically, he says.
Planner and growth expert Randy Carpenter of FutureWest standing on public lands in the Bridger Mountains with Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley unfolding to his back. Todd Wilkinson photo.
Carpenter, who works for the non-profit think-tank FutureWest
, which advises rural communities on how to remain vibrant while preserving their character and sense of place, is not known
for speaking in platitudes.
If and when the anticipated future lying before us
arrives, scientists and planners like Carpenter, who have witnessed the results
of runaway growth elsewhere, say a vital part of Greater Yellowstone,
the most heralded complex of still-wild terrain in the West will be lost.
“In the middle of a boom, we rarely hear about downsides,” Carpenter, a native of Iowa, says. “The boosters don’t
want to hear it. They choose to live in denial and their attitude works as
long as it’s not challenged. I’ve seen a lot of farms and wildlife habitat disappear but I’ve never
seen a subdivision vanish. Concrete, asphalt, roads, traffic, noise
pollution—they are forever. What we forget is that the Greater Yellowstone
Ecosystem isn't just uncommon. It is an American treasure and the only one of its kind in the world.”
Whether one is Republican or Democrat, a political
conservative or liberal, Carpenter reckons that few enjoy paying higher taxes. One prominent expert on land use planning has
described growth as essentially a Ponzi scheme
by which the economic costs
associated with frenzied growth in the present are paid for by receipts generated from growth in the future. The implication is that citizens unknowingly subsidize
the very kind of costly growth and profits for special interests they don’t want to pay for.
What’s at stake? In a word, wildness; more specifically, a rare quality of wildness capable of sustaining the survival of an unsurpassed
assemblage of free-ranging wild creatures. This—wildlife— is the superlative that sets Greater Yellowstone apart from any
other region in the Lower 48. It has every major species
that was here before Europeans arrived on the continent, most notably grizzly
bears and wolves, bison, elk, pronghorn, deer herds, moose and a huge
diversity of bird and other mammals, including wolverines, black-footed ferrets
Canada lynx, trumpeter swans and sage grouse.
What makes Greater Yellowstone eminently distinct is that
the large ungulate herds still move across the landscape along ancient
migration pathways between seasonal summer habitats in the mountains, where
mothers give birth to their young, and winter ranges. The routes used by elk, mule deer and
pronghorn are among the longest in North America. Such migrations have
vanished everywhere else due to habitat fragmentation caused by human
activities. Why do conservation biologists liken Greater Yellowstone to the wildebeest migration across Africa's Serengeti Plain? This is why. See map below.
This map created by the Wyoming Migration Initiative identified the long-distance elk migrations that spiral in and out of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. It's one of the things that make the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem extraordinary in the world.. Map courtesy Wyoming Migration Initiative (http://migrationinitiative.org)
What has spared Greater Yellowstone is its relative
geographic isolation, the fact that it does not have a major urban area like
Salt Lake City, Denver, or Boise parked on its doorstep. Indeed, the Front Range of the
Colorado Rockies and the Wasatch Front are perhaps the poster children of how
true wildness in the West has eroded and suffers in the age of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene
being a term describing the era in which human presence wields such influence that it not only causes climate change and species extinctions but fundamentally alters the function of nature itself.
Bozeman is positioned on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s
northern flank but by dint of setting it is also a wildlife crossroads between wildlands
to the south and north, east and west. (Mountain Journal will explore the vital
importance of having functioning biological corridors between other ecosystems
in future stories).
The 20 contiguous counties comprising Greater Yellowstone are, put together, the fastest growing rural region in the country. It’s vital to note the caveat that not all of
Greater Yellowstone’s counties have significantly growing populations, but the
ones that do have created a spillover effect that impacts their slower-growing
The growth in Bozeman/Gallatin is actually a harbinger,
experts say. Parallel growth scenarios are playing out around the
region—astride the Tetons in adjoining Teton County, Wyoming and Teton County,
Idaho; the booming state highway 20 corridor between Idaho Falls, Rexburg and
Island Park, Idaho; the southern tier of Jackson Hole stretching toward Hoback
Junction and Star Valley; a triangle of topography formed by Cody, Wyoming, Red
Lodge, Montana and Billings. More people
also are pouring into Paradise Valley between Livingston along the Yellowstone
River and Gardiner, that is itself the northern gateway to Yellowstone National
How will the wild character of Greater Yellowstone be changed when Bozeman/Gallatin Valley hold as many people as present-day Minneapolis? What happens to the Teton region when the corridor between Idaho Falls-Rexburg and Teton Valley-Jackson Hole is covered in Salt Lake City-style sprawl?
Conservatively, if the growth rate of the past 30 years continues, the
overall population of the Greater Yellowstone region is expected to surge, in
just 13 years’ time, from the current 450,000 denizens, to 677,000. That
translates on the ground, he says, to another100,000 homes. “And I wouldn’t be
surprised if it doesn’t grow faster than that,” Carpenter says. (The population of the entire state of Wyoming is 585,000; Montana a little over 1 million; and Idaho 1.7 million)
The average number of people per dwelling in Greater Yellowstone homes is about 2.3, half the number of two
generations ago. Yet even with fewer
inhabitants, homes are being built with more square footage; many are going up
in the forested wildland-urban interface where they are more likely to burn in
a wildfire and residents expect to receive expensive taxpayer-subsidized firefighting services.
Others, craving views, will unknowingly and with no context provided by realtors, site
their dream casas in important wildlife winter range or near riparian areas
(river corridors) considered biodiversity hotspots.
The space claimed by those homes in exurbia is not merely the envelope
of the structure itself but it includes access roads and driveways, outbuildings, gardens
and lawns fenced to keep wildlife out, barking dogs, housecats preying on
songbirds, mini horse pastures, lawn watering, invasive weeds and herbicides applied to keep them at bay, and ground disturbance to accommodate essential
services such as electricity, plumbing and septic.
Conservatively, if the growth rate of the past 30 years continues, the overall population of the Greater Yellowstone region is expected to surge, in just 13 years’ time, from the current 450,000 denizens, to 677,000. That translates on the ground to another100,000 homes.
Once infrastructure is bulldozed in for one subdivision, it fuels more
adjacent access roads, and thus more infrastructure, accelerating the pace of
exurban development and results in rising costs for counties, e.g. taxpayers, to provide public services. “Bozeman/Gallatin isn’t considered a metro area yet but by
the middle of the next decade it will be and if we know anything about
development trends nationwide, areas located at the edge of metro areas are growing
fastest,” Carpenter says. “Before a baby
born this year graduates from the new high school in Bozeman, she will watch
the valley where she’s growing up add the equivalent of a Boulder, Colorado to
The current 450,000 population figure for Greater Yellowstone’s population does not include
the 160,000 people currently living in nearby Billings/Yellowstone County
located just 20 miles beyond the official northeast edge of the ecosystem. This
is important because with Gallatin and Yellowstone counties bookending 140
miles of U.S. Interstate 90 between them, in-fill of development on the
landscape is expected to be rapid and some have speculated that by the middle of this century there could be between 800,000 and 1 million people living between Three Forks and Billings.
growth in Bozeman/Gallatin is actually a harbinger of parallel growth scenarios
playing out around the region—astride the Tetons in adjoining Teton County,
Wyoming and Teton County, Idaho; the booming state highway 20 corridor between
Idaho Falls, Rexburg and Island Park, Idaho; the southern tier of Jackson Hole
stretching toward Hoback Junction and Star Valley; a triangle of topography
formed by Cody, Wyoming, Red Lodge, Montana and Billings. More people
also are pouring into Paradise Valley between Livingston along the Yellowstone
River and Gardiner, that is itself the northern gateway to Yellowstone National
Beyond Bozeman’s coming sprawl, there is another stunning
a decade or two, the population in the resort community of Big Sky could be
approaching the size of Jackson Hole’s and will
result in a complete biological east-west decapitation of the north-south
running Madison Mountain Range. The Madisons have been an important passageway
for wildlife. Big Sky, already bursting at the seams along the Gallatin River
will be spilling westward out across the forested mountains into the Madison Valley. The
enclave of Ennis will at least double. All of these figures do not include the large and increasing number of second home owners who do not claim Greater Yellowstone as their primary
residence with the U.S. Census Bureau.
Within a few decades, the
connect-the-dots corridor of Idaho Falls/Bonneville County, Idaho (currently 110K people) -Rexburg/Madison County, Idaho (40K)-Driggs/Victor/Teton County, Idaho (10K)-Jackson
Hole/Teton County, Wyoming (24K)-Afton/Star Valley/Lincoln County, Wyoming (20K)-Pinedale/Sublette County, Wyoming (10K) will hold its own greater Salt Lake City equivalent of sprawl. Cody/Park County will hold a Bozeman-sized population. The Upper Yellowstone River Valley, between Gardiner and Livingston, will also be approaching Bozeman of today. Further, Billings/Laurel will be spilling into Red Lodge.
What is happening
in Gallatin County, as just one example, does indeed have huge spill-over effect implications for the
Madison and Paradise valleys, and the open space defining Bridger Canyon and
even the Shields Valley along the western face of the Crazy Mountains. Several ecologists told me that even if public land remains unchanged and not significantly impaired—an impossibility with climate change and energy development—the effects of private land
development will doom the major wildlife migration corridors.
While Greater Yellowstone is still ecologically intact,
the way humans relate to it is multi-dimensionally fragmented. Again, among wildlife professionals there is
widespread agreement that unless leaders (including public land managers,
county commissioners, state legislators and mayors) think big and cohesively,
making conscious effort to avert destructive patterns of sprawl that have degraded
natural environments elsewhere, Greater Yellowstone is destined to follow the
On top of the inward population migration of permanent and part-time residents, the front-country areas of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national
parks, already choked with summer traffic, have broken visitation records
almost every year for the last decade. Escalating recreation pressure is
happening too. Mountain biking and ATV users on national forests and BLM lands accounts for some of the largest
growth in backcountry users and they are reaching remote places considered important
and safe refugia for wildlife.
The majority of Greater Yellowstone’s public landscape is
administered by the U.S. Forest Service which oversees five different national
forests that report to three different regions. There is presently no cohesive framework within the Forest Service for assessing what the rapidly cumulative impacts of expanding recreation are
on wildlife or what they’ll be in the future. The Forest Service claims it is both too understaffed and underfunded to generate the data it needs to make truly informed decisions.
Correspondingly, a complaint being more frequently leveled
against some regional and national environmental groups in
Greater Yellowstone is that those organizations are happy to fundraise by highlighting the threats
of resource extraction activities such as mining and energy development. But, critics of those groups say, they are unwilling to call out the
impacts of recreation or scrutinize private land development for fear of alienating donors or losing popularity in the communities where they work. Is that true? Mountain Journal will examine it in future stories.
Another major problem is that local and regional media has
largely been missing in action in writing about growth. To date, there has not been a single
journalist or publication devoted to covering the big-picture issues of the entire Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem full time. Truth be told, the stories that have
been written about growth in the region have been lacking in depth and
As damaging as intensive energy development is to habitat for sensitive species on public lands such as sage grouse, and as disruptive as it is to migrating wildlife such as pronghorn and mule deer, eventually it goes away, allowing rehab specialists to try to restore the land's ecological function. But the impacts that private land subdivisions have on wildlife are forever and they can negatively affect the health of species living on public land.. Photo of the Pinedale Anticline/Jonah Field complex courtesy EcoFlight (ecoflight.org)
How can the public engage in informed discussion about
what’s at stake if the media—which reaches the greatest number of
people—examines growth myopically? In cases where the media has covered stories,
the reporting has been misleading or notable for the questions that aren’t
Gallatin County, Kendall
wrote, is expected to hit 145,000 residents by 2060. But Prospera’s projections and Kendall’s
reporting, were off. Way way off, in fact, by several times what the actual
growth rate is. The data used by
Prospera and the state calculated growth in Gallatin Valley at .8 percent when,
again, it is closer to 4 percent in Bozeman/Gallatin.
“I found their publishing of this data to be bizarre,”
Carpenter said. The problem with the Prospera report, besides the faulty
algorithms used to calculate the growth rate, is that elected officials have
pointed to it in their assertions that growth isn’t an issue. In fact, some vocal individuals claim that protecting public lands and planning and zoning on private land that safeguards open space and the environment are impediments to job creation.
As data being crunched by another Bozeman-based
think-tank Headwaters Economics suggest, healthy wildlands and wildlife
populations (indicated by the elk migration map above) are, far from inhibiting
economic development, Greater Yellowstone’s most potent engines for
prosperity. Nature is Greater Yellowstone's golden goose.
“The big issue is just the level of disturbance being caused by constant, rising levels of human activity and it gets complicated for wildlife pretty fast. By the time you recognize a problem, it can be too late." —Brent Brock
Together, the two national parks at the heart of Greater
Yellowstone—Yellowstone and Grand Teton—infuse $1 billion in annual
commerce driven by nature tourism to the region, with the marquee attractions being
grizzlies, wolves and big game animals. The prospect of seeing wildlife
attracts people from around the world.
Bozeman has become the state’s busiest commercial airport, as has
Jackson Hole’s in Wyoming.
Nature tourism has yielded sustainable commerce more
reliable than the proceeds in recent years generated by the other
pillars—agriculture, logging, hard-rock mining and coal (subject variously to
the whims to weather and markets).
The magnetic appeal of wildness in Greater Yellowstone’s
22.5 million acres of land, an area equal to the size of South Carolina, and
the preponderance of it taking the form of federal public lands, has a net
annual economic value of more than $4 billion, suggests Headwaters Economics founder Ray Rasker.
Even U.S. Rep. Greg Gianforte, when he operated RightNow
Technology (since acquired by Oracle), told me in a story I wrote for The Christian Science Monitor
that Bozeman/Gallatin’s clean
and healthy environment was a major enticement for luring top-flight computer
programmers to work for his company here.
But should Bozeman or even the governor of Montana be trying to aggressively recruit Silicon Valley
firms to move their operations? What would be both the upshot and the downside to
landscape and the livability of the Gallatin Valley if, say, 1,000 new,
high-paying tech jobs were suddenly created?
No one, of course, is suggesting that good-paying jobs aren't good, but most of those jobs would likely go to outsiders and families relocating here, further taxing schools, roads, eating up more land. Were the prospect presented, would it be wise for city/county/state leaders to encourage it to happen, essentially pressing the accelerator on a speed of growth that is already explosive but being met with no coherent plan to deal with it?
In a recent study with several authors, Andy Hansen, a conservation biologist and director of the Landscape Biodiversity Lab at Montana State University in Bozeman, noted that the number of private land tracts with no homes or few homes in Greater Yellowstone is declining. Meanwhile, the number of parcels with one home per 40 acres increased 328 percent from 1970 to 2010.
In 2013, 30 percent of Greater Yellowstone was considered “developed,” and some wildlife migration pathways were believed to be imperiled. By 2020, between 5 and 40 percent of the ecosystem’s most biologically rich habitats will undergo conversion from ranch and farmland to exurban development, he told me in a story I wrote for National Geographic.
Biologist Brent Brock, who operates a consulting business,
HoloScene Wildlife Services, in Bozeman, thinks about the implications of human population pressure already being exerted on wildlife that inhabits both the front and backcountry. “The big issue is just
the level of disturbance being caused by constant, rising levels of human activity and it gets
complicated for wildlife pretty fast. By the time you recognize a problem, it
can be too late,” Brock says. “For the longtime survival of species at a
population level, such as wolverines and grizzlies, maintaining connectivity
between wild lands inside Greater Yellowstone and beyond is essential and it necessarily includes wildlife being able
to get safely through gauntlets of development in river valleys and across highways.”
The renowned guru of conservation biology, Reed Noss, has
said nothing impacts the fabric of wildness more than roads or even recreation trails carrying heavy volumes of people. Based on his own research, Brock
“The effects are insidious because impacts might seem
minor in the beginning but they can escalate,” he says. “Traffic volumes can cause animals
to avoid moving through areas and they increase the probability of conflict.
With development occurring in wildlife habitat or recreationists flooding into an area it’s the same thing. Either you
are taking habitat directly away from wildlife or indirectly because the
infrastructure brings in more people and it diminishes the carrying capacity
and creates population sinks. People might see wildlife around for a while but
offspring aren’t surviving so eventually the animals just disappear. The
wildlife that do adapt become ‘mid-wild’ or habituated or it might mean, given the level of
disturbance, that elk don’t migrate anymore.”
For those Greater Yellowstone residents who are indifferent to such impacts, unbridled
growth has consequences for the very quality of life people are fleeing other
areas to come here.
As Carpenter and I stand on the flanks of Sypes Canyon
peering into the wood smoke from forest fires, he mentions that as Bozeman/Gallatin fledge into a
full-fledged metro area, the beloved views of the Bridgers could, within a
decade or two, become shrouded by smog that rivals Salt Lake City, seriously
impairing air quality (and not including bad air made worse by forest fires).
That’s not good news for asthmatics but the most precious
natural resource in Greater Yellowstone is water. A few years ago, a working
group examined water use in Bozeman and arrived at this
conclusion: By the year 2036 or when Bozeman reaches a population of
62,000—whichever comes first—the population of the city will outstrip the
capacity of its existing water supply that takes the form of three reservoirs.
Bozeman’s population already is sailing through 50,000 and
could reach the 62,000 threshold early in the 2020s, a full decade ahead of that
prediction. Then what? “The water needs of the next fifty thousand people cannot be
accommodated with the practices that supplied the first forty-five thousand,”
said Bozeman city employee Lain Leoniak in a piece she wrote for the city’s
Carpenter says water could become a limiting factor that cools Bozeman/Gallatin's growth.
For those who say the answer is simply to build more
reservoir capacity by damming more mountain streams, climatologists note that
the outlook for climate change effects are for hotter and drier summers and
earlier or less winter snowpack. (In future stories, coming soon, I will
address the consequences of that and resorting to groundwater pumping).
But this, too, raises another tantalizing question: If Bozeman, which sits near the headwaters of a major river system, is looking at water challenges, what is going to happen in major urban areas like Phoenix, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Denver and Tucson? Will water shortages and nearly unlivably hot temperatures there result in an exodus of people?
Bozeman City Commissioner Chris Mehl, who is running for
mayor in the fall, works as an analyst at Headwaters Economics and previously served as a Congressional aide.. He is frustrated by the knee-jerk anti-government
sentiment that proliferates in the rural West—based on the trope that “big
government” is trying to rob individuals of their freedoms.
But should the costs of an individual’s right
to do business on private land be passed along to taxpayers and do individuals who are transforming landscapes have any responsibility to help protect assets valuable to the common good,
such as wildlife? It is clear that the free-market and laissez-fair capitalism have never resulted in a wild ecosystem like Greater Yellowstone staying protected.
In fact, there's compelling fiscally-conservative
argument that can be made for planning and zoning because it highlights predictable impacts and allows for crises to better be averted, like those that arise
when towns run out of water, or a subdivision in the county discovers that its
individual wells are contaminated by someone’s raw sewage due to septic systems put
in on the sly and the cheap.
Mehl believes the only way that wildlife issues will
resonate is if the threats are made tangible, not only in the eyes of citizens
but the decision makers they elect. The media plays a crucial role. Paradoxically, at a moment in time when Greater
Yellowstone most needs her residents to rally around a common vision,
ideological divisions are at their deepest.
“To think more broadly and longer term cuts against the
grain of human nature in some people,” Mehl said. “Frankly, I’m seeing a
decline in the willingness of people to think long-term. It’s hard to get them
out of their narrow mindset when they are scrambling to pay the bills.”
Click to enlarge photo: While the viewsheds on the east side of the Tetons are protected by the presence of Grand Teton National Park, the west side of the iconic mountains is experiencing a huge spillover effect from Jackson Hole. Teton Valley, Idaho also is facing growth pressures emanating from Idaho Falls and Rexburg. Composite photo of Teton Valley, Idaho facing the Tetons created by MoJo staff
If Bozeman/Gallatin is one of the main pistons in Greater
Yellowstone, then Jackson Hole/Teton County, Wyoming is the other. Teton County is, per capita, one of the
wealthiest counties in the U.S. because of the high concentration of
uber-wealthy individuals who live there permanently and seasonally. For years,
severe housing shortages have resulted in high home prices and rents so
expensive school teachers and firefighters can’t afford to live there.
the blame is because 97 percent of Teton County is federal or state land and
just three percent is privately owned.
Growth proponents have suggested that public land be divested to
accommodate more development. But the truth is that the highway system in Teton
County is already racked by urban-like congestion.
Today, more hotel rooms in Jackson Hole are being added to
bring in more visitors who are shelling out hundreds of dollars a night while
the service workers making the visitors’ beds have to make long commutes in and
out of the valley. At the same time, multi-million-dollar, 10,000-square-foot
homes are being built not only in Jackson Hole (but also, up north in Big Sky, Montana) exacting huge footprints and many are only inhabited for the equivalent of a few months out of every year. Meantime, development continues to fracture
what remains of wildlife habitat with one indicator of the effects being a
significant number of road-killed animals along the highways.
more people into Teton County, critics of growth say, is not going to resolve
any problems related to the impacts of sprawl and will only exacerbate the
domino effects radiating in all directions.
better or for worse, Jackson Hole is the economic engine for Teton Valley,
Idaho,” says Shawn Hill, executive director of Driggs, Idaho-based Valley
Advocates for Responsible Development
. His valley is located westward just over Teton Pass from Jackson Hole. “When Jackson overheats, we're the
release valve - especially when it comes to housing. However, over half of the
housing units in Teton Valley now sell to second homeowners or investors, which
soaks up much of the already limited housing inventory here.”
Teton Valley Advocates for Responsible Development and the Jackson Hole
Conservation Alliance are three of the very few conservation organizations in Greater Yellowstone
aggressively working on private land growth issues.
A number of excellent land trusts are protecting land by brokering conservation easements in Greater Yellowstone, and an effort called
the High Divide Collaborative is collaborating with ranchers and farmers to
protect agrarian land, but none really engages in the contentious trenches of
shaping public policy. Moreover, the pace of development is far outstripping
the scope of protection being achieved by land trusts alone.
Divide, so named because it applies geographically to the path of the
Continental Divide as it runs from Wyoming into Idaho and Montana, represents
the western flank of Greater Yellowstone.
It’s a microcosm of the big
picture. In the past 50 years, according to Headwaters Economics
, 51 percent of
new homes were built outside of town centers in unincorporated portions of High
Divide counties. Since 2010, this trend has increased and 63 percent of new
homes were built outside of towns.
“This trend of an
increasing amount of development occurring outside of town centers will impact
and compromise the future of important working lands, scenery, and wildlife
habitat for many of the iconic wildlife species associated with the High
Divide, including elk, pronghorn antelope, grizzly bears, and wolverine,”
Headwaters stated in a report.
Dispersed homes also
restrict hunting opportunities, limit scenic vistas and open spaces, and
increase potential conflicts with agricultural land owners.
Among High Divide counties, high degree of variability exists in the amount of out-of-town growth. For
example, in Jefferson and Madison Counties in Idaho, 19 percent of homes built
since 2000 were built out-of-town. By contrast, in Madison County, Montana, one of the agrarian jewels of Greater Yellowstone, 91
percent of new homes put up since 2000 were built out-of-town.
In the past 50 years, the
number of new homes in the High Divide built in the Wildland-Urban Interface,
prone to burning by wildfires, has increased by more than 300 percent, from
2,187 homes in 1963 to 8,915 in 2013. Who is paying for the costs of defending
structures built in vulnerable places? The public. Sprawl is wreaking havoc on the budgets of
some counties struggling to pay for law enforcement, fire protection, emergency
services, roads and their maintenance, planning staff, and transportation for such things as school
In the next 10 years, nearly
150 square miles of currently undeveloped private land on the west side of
Greater Yellowstone is forecasted to experience low-density creeping “exurban”
“Teton Valley, Idaho will not only
be challenged by growth pressure, but also by correcting the mistakes of the
past,” Hill said. “When it comes to managing growth, the Teton Valley community
is often characterized by its divisions, but the vast majority of its residents
want to protect its quiet, rural atmosphere. My biggest fear is that we'll make
the same mistakes again because we've lost sight of why we all choose to live
If county commissioners in Greater Yellowstone aren’t together in addressing the costs and impacts of growth extending beyond their
jurisdictional boundaries, and federal and state agencies aren’t unified in
addressing impacts on and beyond their public land boundaries, what are the
a prevailing mentality that we as a region can deal with challenges the same
way we handled them 20 to 30 years ago, and it’s incredibly shortsighted,”
Carpenter says. “There is nothing preventing us from being smarter. It’s really
a test of whether our leaders have the will and the courage to show they are
capable of consciously avoiding the destructive patterns that have wrecked other places.
Of course, it really comes down to the quality of the people citizens elect.”
As Bozeman/Gallatin races toward becoming Minneapolis and the valleys
straddling the Tetons turn first into Bozeman and then Salt Lake City,
Carpenter says it is recent events elsewhere that keep him up at night.
Greater Yellowstone does not exist in isolation from what’s happening in
the rest of the world and that is the frightening wildcard. “This is
what’s been haunting me,” Carpenter says. “I worry about the deepening impacts of climate change
not just in our region with water and wildfires, but how events from afar impact us. Will hardship elsewhere drive significant numbers of people here?”
Scientists have been discussing the consequences of an ice shelf the
size of Delaware breaking off Antarctica, melting and raising sea levels a foot
along coastal areas where half of the population in the U.S. presently lives,
“And then you look at Houston and
Hurricane Harvey and Florida and Hurricane Irma, and Phoenix broiling in 120-degree heat, the
water shortages coming to cities in the desert Southwest, and the fires in southern
California,” Carpenter says from the slope of the Bridgers. “The current explosive growth in
Greater Yellowstone is happening because the region is attracting a lot of
people coming here with a lot of money wanting to live quieter lives closer to
nature. They are the first big wave.”
That alone, he says, is creating a nightmare of cascading growth-related
issues, to which leadership in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem is either
unable, unwilling or ill-equipped to confront.
PLEASE SUPPORT US
: Mountain Journal is committed to giving you free
reads you won't get anywhere else, stories that take time to produce. In turn, we rely on your generosity and can't survive without you! Please click here
to support a publication devoted to protecting the wild country and the wildlife you love.